DELVE INTO AFRICAN WEALTH
DON'T MISS A BEAT
Subscribe now
Skip to content

South African tycoon Robert Gumede faces R390 Million Covid-19 PPE fraud claim amid Tongaat Hulett bid

South African billionaire Robert Gumede is pursuing a takeover of Tongaat Hulett through Vision Sugar while facing a R390 million Special Tribunal claim that he masterminded a Covid-19 PPE price-gouging scandal involving SAPS.

South African tycoon Robert Gumede faces R390 Million Covid-19 PPE fraud claim amid Tongaat Hulett bid
Robert Gumede

Table of Contents

Robert Gumede, the South African billionaire who has positioned himself as the saviour of embattled sugar producer Tongaat Hulett Limited, is pursuing that rescue while entangled in a Special Tribunal case in which the Special Investigating Unit alleges he was the mastermind behind one of the most egregious alleged procurement frauds of South Africa's Covid-19 pandemic, involving R514 million paid by the South African Police Service for personal protective equipment at prices the SIU says were grossly inflated.

The SIU is seeking a court order compelling Gumede, his nephew Blessing Qwabe and Red Roses Africa to repay the SAPS R390,754,000, which the SIU characterises as unlawful super-profits extracted from an emergency government contract in April 2020. A Competition Tribunal hearing on excessive pricing charges arising from the same transactions is scheduled for October 2026. Both proceedings remain active and unresolved.

Gumede is the most prominent face of the Vision Sugar consortium, which is attempting to acquire Tongaat Hulett, currently under business rescue and on the brink of liquidation. The sugar company's future is one of the most consequential corporate questions in South Africa's agricultural sector, given its scale of operations across KwaZulu-Natal and the livelihoods dependent on its mills and farming operations.

The PPE deal and how the money flowed

The case turns on a single transaction. In late March 2020, five days after President Cyril Ramaphosa declared a national state of disaster, Gumede wrote on behalf of a company then called Mainstreet 699, later renamed Red Roses Africa, to a senior National Treasury official offering to supply PPE. The information was passed to the SAPS, and Red Roses began lobbying police management to place an emergency order.

Red Roses was subsequently awarded a R514,694,000 contract to supply 90,000 25-litre containers of hand sanitiser and two million face masks. Gumede's nephew Qwabe runs Red Roses Africa, which is connected to the broader Guma Group that Gumede chairs.

The SIU's Chief Forensic Investigator, Jackey Mathabathe, says in his affidavit that of the R514 million paid by SAPS, only R162,015,846.50 was actually spent on PPE-related goods and services. The remainder was transferred to related parties and associated individuals. Red Roses paid R1,150 per 25-litre vat of hand sanitiser, sourced locally from companies including Dis-Chem, and sold the same vats to the SAPS at R5,405 each, a markup the Competition Commission separately characterised as 236%.

The SIU further alleges that Gumede told the SAPS the PPE could be imported immediately from China on a specially chartered Airbus. Mathabathe says "there never was any airbus that was ready and waiting or even readily available in China with the required PPE equipment" and that Gumede and Qwabe "appeared to have been either lying or fraudulently misrepresenting the truth to the SAPS so as to induce the conclusion of an urgent contract, or were only going to look for an airbus after the payment was made to them."

After the SAPS paid out, the money was dispersed through a network of 47 companies and associates. Nine were entities within the Guma Group, including Guma Railway Solutions, which received R44.8 million, Gijima Ast Finance, which received R31 million, and Guma Capital, which received R16.6 million. The largest single onward payment, R152.6 million, went to a law firm, Nicqui Galaktiou Inc, which told investigators the funds related to a commercial transaction involving a global IT entity and cited attorney-client confidentiality in declining to provide further detail.

The SIU also alleges a Lamborghini worth more than R4 million was purchased for Gumede from the proceeds of the SAPS tender, with negotiations at Gumede's Sandhurst home commencing on May 1, 2020 and payment of R4 million completed in June 2020, while South Africa remained in hard lockdown. Mathabathe's affidavit states the evidence demonstrates "the obscene and opulent lives lived off the hundreds of millions that they made off this transaction." Gumede's son's Porsche was also allegedly fitted with a performance exhaust system costing more than R260,000, paid from the same proceeds.

Gumede's defence

Gumede's camp has fought back through a detailed 88-page answering affidavit filed by Mario Pillay, a group executive at Guma Group. Pillay describes the SIU's characterisation of Gumede as "scurrilous," insists the PPE prices were reasonable given the chaotic procurement environment of early 2020, presents expert witnesses to support that position and says it is "preposterous" to suggest Gumede had knowledge of or concurred with all the inter-company transfers.

Red Roses also argues it was caught in an internal conflict within the SAPS, claiming to be "the innocent victim of a battle between two elephants," a reference to the public dispute between SAPS National Commissioner Fannie Masemola and retired Deputy National Commissioner Francinah Vuma, who have made contradictory allegations about who was responsible for what within the SAPS at the time.

Gumede is now attempting to use Vuma's testimony at a parliamentary committee, in which she alleged she was unfairly targeted by Masemola, as fresh grounds to ask both the SIU and the Competition Commission to reconsider their cases. Red Roses told investigators it "intends to engage with both the SIU and the Competition Commission to invite them to reconsider their respective cases in light of the evidence presented by Lt General Vuma."

Mathabathe responded to that argument in his replying affidavit filed in January 2026, calling Gumede's camp "opportunistic" and stating he was "vehemently" denying their characterisation of events. He also rejected the personal attacks on his credibility throughout the Guma Group's papers, describing them as reflecting "an attitude of entitlement."

The Tongaat Hulett question

The disclosure of Gumede's ongoing legal entanglements matters because Vision Sugar's bid for Tongaat Hulett is one of the most sensitive corporate transactions in South Africa. Tongaat Hulett, once a flagship of KwaZulu-Natal's agricultural economy, collapsed under the weight of an accounting fraud scandal that emerged in 2019 and has been in business rescue since 2022. Its mills employ thousands of workers, and its fate affects tens of thousands of sugarcane farmers.

The Special Tribunal case is expected to be heard this year. The Competition Tribunal hearing on excessive pricing is scheduled for October 2026. Neither matter has produced a finding against Gumede, and he is contesting both. But the questions they raise are now material context for any assessment of whether Vision Sugar's most prominent backer is the right candidate to oversee one of South Africa's most consequential business rescues.

Latest